On a memorable day in human history, February 12, 1809, two babies were born an ocean apart: Abraham Lincoln in a one-room Kentucky log cabin; Charles Darwin on an English country estate. It was a time of backward-seeming notions, when almost everyone still accepted the biblical account of creation as the literal truth and authoritarianism as the most natural and viable social order. But by the time both men died, the world had changed: ordinary people understood that life on earth was a story of continuous evolution, and the Civil War had proved that a democracy could fight for principles and endure. And with these signal insights much else had changed besides. Together, Darwin and Lincoln had become midwives to the spirit of a new world, a new kind of hope and faith.

Searching for the men behind the icons of emancipation and evolution, Adam Gopnik shows us, in this captivating double life, Lincoln and Darwin as they really were: family men and social climbers; ambitious manipulators and courageous adventurers; the living husband, father, son, and student behind each myth. How do we reconcile Lincoln, the supremely good man we know, with the hardened commander who wittingly sent tens of thousands of young soldiers to certain death? Why did the relentlessly rational Darwin delay publishing his “Great Idea” for almost twenty years? How did inconsolable grief at the loss of a beloved child change each man? And what comfort could either find—for himself or for a society now possessed of a sadder, if wiser, understanding of our existence? Such human questions and their answers are the stuff of this book.

Above all, we see Lincoln and Darwin as thinkers and writers—as makers and witnesses of the great change in thought that marks truly modern times: a hundred years after the Enlightenment, the old rule of faith and fear finally yielding to one of reason, argument, and observation not merely as intellectual ideals but as a way of life; the judgment of divinity at last submitting to the verdicts of history and time. Lincoln considering human history, Darwin reflecting on deep time—both reshaped our understanding of what life is and how it attains meaning. And they invented a new language to express that understanding. Angels and Ages is an original and personal account of the creation of the liberal voice—of the way we live now and the way we talk at home and in public. Showing that literary eloquence is essential to liberal civilization, Adam Gopnik reveals why our heroes should be possessed by the urgency of utterance, obsessed by the need to see for themselves, and endowed with the gift to speak for us all.

"In the year of Darwin's and Lincoln's bicentennial, New Yorker contributor Gopnik (Through the Children's Gate) can't resist the temptation to find parallels of cultural impact between the men, born on the same day in 1809, seeing them as twin exemplars of modernity. Gopnik notes that 'it is not what they have in common with each other that matters; it is what they have in common with us.' And that commonality lies in the modern way of speaking (plainly) and thinking (scientific and liberal in the broad sense). But the comparison of the two men feels like a stretch, and Gopnik's notion that the very idea of democracy was precarious until Lincoln freed the slaves isn't wholly convincing. In potted biographies of the two, Gopnik emphasizes the influence of Lincoln the lawyer on Lincoln the politician, and Darwin's unusual abilities as a writer of science. Most successfully, Gopnik underscores the importance of eloquence in spreading new ideas, and his notion that Lincoln and Darwin exemplify the modern predicament — that humans must live in the 'space between what we know and what we feel' — is resonant and worth thinking about." Publishers Weekly (Copyright Reed Business Information, Inc.)

Although this is Adam Gopnik's sixth book, he is best-known for his charming and intelligent pieces in the New Yorker about almost any and every subject: the process of psychotherapy (which blew me away so completely I wrote him a fan letter about it), the experience of getting married, of having children, of moving to Paris and living there, moving back and everything you can think of in between.... Washington Post Book Review (read the entire Washington Post review) He is a master of the familiar essay, a modern-day, very sophisticated Charles Lamb.

And in that spirit, he has written this "short book" on Abraham Lincoln and Charles Darwin, both born on the same date, Feb. 12, 1809 (one in a cabin, one in a country house), both of whom radically changed the way Americans and Englishmen think about the modern world.

We all know what they did: Lincoln saved the Union and freed the slaves; Darwin closely examined the natural world for years and came up with the theory of evolution, which wasn't exactly a theory but an enormous body of evidence suggesting that Earth wasn't just a few thousand years old, as Scripture stated, but older than we could imagine or exactly measure. Not only that: Man and woman had not been fashioned in a couple of days directly by God but had evolved, over many years, from hairy primates, monkeys and apes.

If we managed to stay awake in high school, we all know that. The task Gopnik has set for himself is to make this material new for us, to get us thinking or — if we're too lazy to do that — to at least be comforted by the fact that someone else is doing the thinking for us.

But there's some trouble in comparing these two great men. Lincoln was a politician and, though a great one, was making political decisions in just one country. To say he freed the slaves isn't even altogether true. After the Civil War, African Americans enjoyed a couple of years of freedom before Southern whites managed to grind them down to perhaps a worse position than they had been in before. It took almost a hundred more years before the civil rights movement began the process of real emancipation again. And (much as we might like to think so), the United States is not the world. Slavery still exists in parts of Africa and Asia; right here in Los Angeles, from where I write, there's a gleaming condominium on Sunset Boulevard that recently housed dozens of sex slaves imported from all over the world. But still, Lincoln abolished slavery as a legal institution in this country.

To compare him to Darwin, though, in any way except by shared birthdays seems arbitrary. Darwin asks us to change the way we think about how and why every human exists and — if we are Christian — to change our way of thinking about creation and the afterlife. To put these two men in the same category is like comparing a saddle shoe to a saddle. One is noticeably bigger than the other.

The title "Angels and Ages" comes from the controversy over whether Edwin Stanton, Lincoln's secretary of war, cried out over the president's dead body, "Now he belongs to the (BEG ITALages" or "to the angels." In other words, do we live in a secular or supernatural world?

The book is divided into six essays: two on Darwin, two on Lincoln, and an introduction and a conclusion in which the author organizes his thoughts about these great men. Gopnik makes the point that Lincoln was a very successful lawyer who thrived on negotiation and compromise. And Lincoln loved that he had been able to acquire a lovely home, an expensive wife and a passel of darling sons. He was a family man and liked it that way. He tried to steer clear of the hotheaded Southern code of honor that led to duels and conflict; a person could get hurt going down that tempting path. These Lincoln essays are laudable, but it's hard to be new about him. He's been as hard-used by scholars and writers as a bar of hotel soap.

The Darwin essays, on the other hand, are delightful. He was so crazy about collecting beetles, for instance, that on seeing and wanting to capture three of them, he put one in each hand and another in his mouth. He went on that amazing five-year trip around the world on the Beagle. He had 10 children with his loving wife, and he induced his kids to help in an experiment about whether earthworms could hear, by playing bassoons to check out the worms' responses. All this is wonderful stuff, tempered by the heartbreaking fact that both men lost a beloved child at a young age. When "On the Origin of Species" was published in 1859, it was remarkably and easily assimilated into the culture, Gopnik tells us. Evolution as a concept was pretty much a done deal; other scholars had done much of the groundwork already, and at the time of publication, less than half of all Englishmen were regular churchgoers.

The other half were, though. Gopnik seems to think that belief in a personal God who cares about human beings is an utterly passe idea that went out with the advent of the Enlightenment. Of contemporary Americans, he says, "Only very simple people of faith any longer live by an unquestionable divine covenant. ... The hold of fear and superstition has lessened. We know how men got here. Science has revealed many things, if not everything." That's when you have to remember that Gopnik is a New Yorker who writes for the New Yorker. His knowledge of the ordinary world is limited. He's like George H.W. Bush, bewildered in the supermarket, baffled by a bar code. Hasn't Gopnik ever seen a mega-church? Isn't he aware of all those books about the Rapture that have outsold his own by the millions? Doesn't he know that grants for the pursuit of science have decreased markedly in the last couple of decades — partly because of the sticky matter of the theory of evolution? Because of his intellectual provincialism, his high-handed dismissal of conventional Christianity (which dismisses evolution in turn), the author has lost the opportunity to write what could have been an extremely important book and given us, again, six charming, familiar essays.

Reviewed by Carolyn See, who can may be reached at www.carolynsee.com, Washington Post Book World (Copyright 2006 Washington Post Book World Service/Washington Post Writers Group)
(hide most of this review)

Adam Gopnik has been writing for The New Yorker since 1986. He is a three-time winner of the National Magazine Award for Essays and for Criticism and the George Polk Award for Magazine Reporting. From 1995 to 2000, he lived in Paris; he now lives in New York City with his wife and their two children.